Village Auto Insurance FAQ
Compare Insurance Quotes!
Compare Insurance Quotes!
 

Why Is Sarah Palin Being Blamed For The Rape Kit Thing If Her City Council Voted To Charge Peoples Insurance?

Sep 22, 2008 by | Posted in Politics

The burgh council of wasilla voted to charge womens insurance carriers.

Now we have the left jumping up and down saying "why is palin unsatisfactory to charge women for rape kits".


Disgusting. The far fair is just as guilty and both extremes who ignore things like facts exceedingly suck.

As a taxpayer I wouldn't poverty to be paying for so called "rape kits" or any other medical check-up. Should the town or state also pay for CT scans after a person gets hit by a car? Or surgery after a stabbing? The wrong has nothing to do with the care.

Related Topics:

Insurance Sevierville Tn
Insurance Software Companies In
Insurance Sparwood

Obama kicks kittens
www.scapegoatz.com | Sep 22, 2008

Palin was the supervision...remember? It was her administration that should have taken the lead.
fdm215 | Sep 22, 2008

Palin was the bodily in charge and ultimately the buck stops there. This is as bad as charging police officers for bullets.

After a defile why should a woman or man have to be concerned about insurance when they are already severely traumatized?
Chi Guy | Sep 22, 2008

Because she supported it and never said anything against it. Her borough only had like 6000 people. It really wasn't going to be that big of an expense to eat.

As a bird, I am a little bit miffed. If the victims did not have insurance, should they choose whether or not to pursue the rapist??
Jessie R | Sep 22, 2008

Ahhh I get it. You're robbing form the play book, how can Bush be responsible for the state of the realm if there's a congress.

WOW!! LOL!

Kinda like, it wasn't Hitler's fault, the German people let him do it.
Or here's another one... The guy who rapes the missus and then says, did you see the sexy clothes she was wearing, you know she wanted it!

OK... keep wealthy you know the drill.
huckleberryjay | Sep 22, 2008

 

176 Republicans Voted To Prevent Poor Women Who Paid For Health Insurance Under The Proposed Government?

Nov 08, 2009 by rec | Posted in Elections

well-being care program as an amendment to the health care bill. Yet only one Republican voted to contribute health care to those poor women and the fetus they are required them to finance to full term. What do you think of this? Apparently they would rather see hundreds or thousands of women go with out insurance than all one to have an abortion.

What the Pandemonium did you just say? O_o English please.
whitetigergrowl | Nov 08, 2009

And how many Democrats? Do you even be sure?
Rigor Morty | Nov 08, 2009

219 Democrats voted to cut Medicare for seniors.
God's Reporter | Nov 08, 2009

After you get a job get a soul, oh no wait, Obama sold your job to China.
Just get a life, never capacity the government will own you soon so you won't have a life either.
Well thanks to lazy idiots like you now all of us are screwed, thanks Asshole.
yeahright_V | Nov 08, 2009

I about you should go spend a night at that hotel that makes you smarter. You have completely mischaractorized the voter making your statment nonsense.
Jim Bay | Nov 08, 2009

 

How Can Low Income People Buy Health Insurance Under The Plan Being Voted On?

Nov 09, 2009 by Curious | Posted in Insurance

If we are to have commanded health insurance, how will low income people pay for it? I'm already struggling with what little I have now. I can't afford to take on anymore. I be informed we can still go to our doctor of choice but, but again how will we pay for this insurance?? Also I have never had any sort of medical insurance just for the fact I can't in conflict with any.

Marked question. Problem is no one knows the answer yet. Everyone is waiting for those details. That is why so many people are intimidated of this health care bill. There are not enough details about it such as the important question that you asked.

Related Topics:

Insurance Sherman Tx
Insurance Solvency International
Insurance Study Books

The objective is to provide federal subsidies of some sort to assist lower return people in purchasing health insurance. The details are not all worked out at this point, since the bill still needs approbation in the Senate (which will undoubtedly challenge the House version.) Keep watching for the immutable result of the bill.
acermill | Nov 09, 2009

They are raising the receipts requirements for medicaid so you probably won't be taxed any more and you probably won't have to pay for your insurance either.

If you develop a serious disability how would you pay for that?
As it is now insurance companies can deny you insurance if your hair is too short.

You are the people who would benefit the most. It's the ones who pilfer over $500,000 who are gonna have to pay.
fav | Nov 09, 2009

If you can't give it then you probably already qualify for state assistance through Medicaid.
Insurance Pickle.com | Nov 09, 2009

It doesn't go into tenor for three more years, so you've got three years to find a better job!
mbrcatz | Nov 09, 2009

Spectacular question. Problem is no one knows the answer yet. Everyone is waiting for those details. That is why so many people are faint-hearted of this health care bill. There are not enough details about it such as the important question that you asked.
car253 | Nov 09, 2009

Keith Olbermann: Senators Opposed to "Socialized" Health Insurance Voted for "Socialized ...

(Via crooksandliars.com ) As Keith notes, the Senators who abhor the idea of a public option for health insurance sure didn't have any refractory ...

Can Dems Resolve the Abortion Split on Health Care?

16.11.09

Republican congressional leaders have to be chuckling bang on now. In the end, all the tea-party town halls, Glenn Beck rallies and "decease panel" rumors may have less of a hand in bringing down health pains reform than an intraparty Democratic culture war.

Congressman Bart Stupak of Michigan, whose rectification restricting abortion coverage on all policies sold through the new insurance argument paved the way for passage of health reform in the House of Representatives, vows that "there will be abyss to pay" if his language gets stripped out of, or weakened in, the final legislation. Senate moderates like Ben Nelson and Kent Conrad have stopped impolite of demanding the exact Stupak language, but have warned that miserable abortion restrictions could force them to vote no on health fix. Abortion-rights advocates, who are still stunned by the last-minute grapple with that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi made to allow a suffrage on Stupak's controversial measure, claim the provision will greatly limit the availability of abortions, strikingly for low-income women. They have dubbed it "the coat-hanger repay."

Source: TIME

a Directory

Article: Senate Delays Auto Insurance Vote - The Boston Globe
Upon today for a free trial, credit card req'd. Find The Boston Globule articles plus many other academic journal articles, magazine articles & newspaper archives.

Where's 'compassion' in health insurance vote?
I wrote him and asked if he voted for children's fettle insurance or against children's ... Johnson voted against children's health insurance. ...

Alaska's senators support second health insurance vote - KTUU ...
... and voted to bourgeon funding for the State Children's Health ... The vote would give form insurance to an additional four million lower-income children. ...

© 2010 Village Auto Insurance FAQ