What Are Some Good Jobs To Look At For Someone With Alot Of General Knowledge, But Not A College Degree?
Dec 17, 2007 by JKP0011 | Posted in Other - Careers & Employment
Looking for at least $30,000 a year. Do not have the outmoded to attend college due to having to work full time. Would like to transmute a goal of no less than $30,000 a year with health insurance, vacation, etc. What types of jobs should I look into? Serious and LEGAL answers only please...
Depending where you room and how the market is right now, real estate can be a good venture without certainly having a college degree. Granted you will be taking a real demesne class for your license but even so this is a great thing to have.
That would 100% depend on what your interests, strengths, and experiences (exertion and non-work) are in. What can you do (typing speed, customer relations skills, bi or tri-lingual, trade better in a team or on your own, want to work with people directly or indirectly, do you like working with children, are you into wirepulling, etc...)? Tell us about yourself. More info please?
Learning Conformity | Dec 17, 2007
Truly, I know a lot of people are not open to it, but a Customer Service Representative. Not reasonable to meet your salary requirements, but because this experience will benefit almost any future maven career.
bonx | Dec 17, 2007
Depending where you survive and how the market is right now, real estate can be a good venture without surely having a college degree. Granted you will be taking a real mansion class for your license but even so this is a great thing to have.
chris m | Dec 17, 2007
Gov. Mandated Health Insurance Failed In Mass & Tenn Miserably, Almost Bankrupted Them, The Costs Were Extreme?
Aug 08, 2009 by Yogi | Posted in Politics
because of the dynamics of direction run care. What makes you think it will be any different?
I mean after Federally funded Educate Programs have failed so miserably after we pay 8 times what we used to and have worse course of study.
The federal government can't do anything right. They work to steal from us for their own special interests. They put burdens on the system to secure they can steal from it.
Medicare and Medicaid are bastions of corruption.
What makes any brains trust individual think that giving government actual control of this is a wholesome idea? I think it is literally insane. What is the definition of insanity? Doing the same preoccupation over and over and expecting a different result. Of course the Feds will screw it up, and we are talking about 1/6th of the terseness!
We need to stick to the constitution. The Federal Government is in no imaginable way authorized to do this possession.
I am in favor of very deep reforms, but not getting the Federal government into it through anything but regulations against unfair billing practices and stepping on the necks of lawyers who gumption frivolous suits and making the bringer of those suits pay the hospitals legal fees.
Why not do federal by state experimentation in stead of destroying the whole economy on something that is proven not to profession?
And why does it have to be passed BEFORE ANYONE READS THE STUPID BILL? Why does Obama state on voting for these things WITH NO TIME TO READ THEM, LET ALONE UNDERSTAND THEM?
I mean Obama complained about not having 2 weeks to comprehend legislation on the Patriot act, (which he has made more invasive since coming into office, by the way).
This kind of quirk takes time to get right. Some careless push for something written up in general terms that takes up 1/6th of our curtness is just an idiotic move, unless you want to deliberately destroy the fiscal system of the country. I personally think that's what Obama is up to. He wishes to do that so he can destroy our system and put in his own, whole with his own Oligarchy. If not, then why the idiotic rush?
No, that kind of rush isn't democracy, it's correctly called idiocracy. Anyone who supports that crap, without even reading the bill? Is being less than they can be, I assumption anyway lol.
NONE OF THESE PLANS TAKE PLACE BEFORE 2113, WHY THE HURRY NOW? IT'S STUPID!!!!!!!!!
It won't be any other, but they will lie the same lie and the same suckers will buy it.
Oh yea - why the idiotic rush? Because he promised it in his campaign, and people voted for him. Now they need him to deliver what he promised. It's called democracy.
Richard_SM | Aug 08, 2009
And yet many on the Retaliate for support the man that sighed that cluster F--- of a bill into law Gov. Mitt Romney. That was epidemic health care. That is not whats being proposed.
Mr. Wolf (blocked by many) | Aug 08, 2009
You put out some good points. People won't even read through your whole question, I am sure they don't skilled in whats in the bill they are pushing. It is sad. Why can't the details be fully revealed first? It only makes feel something in one's bones.
jakeb | Aug 08, 2009
What's Your Thought About #1 Having A Health-Care Program, And #2 Should Illegal Aliens Be Included?
Sep 28, 2009 by Janice | Posted in Immigration
Liberals Invite Health-care Access for Illegals
By Stephen Dinan
Fearful that they're losing inform on immigration and health care, a group of House Democrats is pushing back and arguing that any health feel interest bill should extend to all legal immigrants and allow illegal immigrants some access.
The Democrats, infuriating to stiffen their party's spines on the contentious issue, say it's unfair to bar outlawed immigrants from paying their own way in a government-sponsored exchange. Legal immigrants, they say, regardless of how lengthy they've been in the United States, should be able to get government-subsidized health care if they heed the other eligibility requirements.
"Legal permanent residents should be able to obtain their plans, and they should also be eligible for subsidies if they need it. Undocumented, if they can afford it, should be masterly to buy their own private plans. It keeps them out of the emergency room," said Rep. Michael M. Honda, California Democrat and chairman of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus.
Mr. Honda was joined by more than 20 of his colleagues in two letters laying out the demands.
Coverage for immigrants is one of the thorniest issues in the health keeping debate, and one many Democratic leaders would like to avoid. But immigrant rights groups and the Democrats who sent the letters say they have to take a remain now.
President Obama has said he does not want health care proposals to double illegal immigrants. The bill drawn up by Sen. Max Baucus, Montana Democrat and chairman of the Senate Investment capital Committee, excludes illegal immigrants from his proposed health care disagreement.
Mr. Honda and his allies, though, say illegal immigrants should be allowed to pay for insurance if they can afford it, even if it comes through a oversight-established exchange. As a generally young, healthy part of the population, illicit immigrants could help reduce overall costs for those who buy into health exchange plans, the lawmakers said.
The Democrats' letters, however, do not dispute ultimatums or threaten to withhold support for the bills if their requests aren't met.
The Public Council of La Raza launched its own "flood their voice post" campaign last week to put pressure on Mr. Baucus to expand coverage in his suggestion to include all legal immigrants and to drop verification language in the legislation that would fend illegal immigrants from obtaining coverage.
Mr. Honda told The Washington Times that he's not pushing for felonious immigrants to gain access to taxpayer-subsidized benefits. "That's an assertion that's been done already," he said.
Rep. Steve King, Iowa Republican, said proposals that register government coverage for illegal immigrants leave him incredulous.
"If anybody can, with a rehabilitate face, advocate that we should provide health insurance for people who broke into our country, strapped our law and for the most part are criminals, I don't know where they ever would draw the line," he said.
Mr. Ruler, who opposes Democrats' health care plans in general, said illegal migrant access in legislation "would be a poison pill that would cause health trouble to go down" to defeat.
Twenty-nine Democrats signed on to the letter on legal immigrants, while 21 signed the learning on covering illegal immigrants. Although the leadership of the Congressional Black Caucus signed the legal-alien letter in their capacity as CBC officials, they signed the other letter as individual members of Congress.
Under the 1996 good law overhaul, Congress restricted most federal benefits to longtime holders of grassy cards - those who have been in the country at least five years.
But Democrats chipped away at that find when they reauthorized the State Children's Health Insurance Program earlier this year and allowed states to quilt all immigrant children and pregnant women, regardless of how long they've been in the rural area.
In their letter, the Democrats said health care costs are much lower for legal immigrants than for innate citizens.
"Immigrants are part of our families, our communities, our economy, and promote to the fabric of America," they wrote. "It is simply harm that their taxes would pay for public health insurance programs to which they are not allowed access."
Since it is forbidden for these people to be here they should not be considered eligible for any program, whether they pay into it or not.
Consider it a fine for disobeying our immigration laws.
As extended as illegal aliens receive benefits in any form from the US they will continue to distributed illegally.
If the Fed's seriously want to put a permanent stop to illegal immigration they have got to take away the incentives that compose them here.
"It is simplly wrong that any taxes paid in would go to any new programs and should be in use accustomed to only to pay back what US taxpayers have already expended in their behalf." It has taken 20 years for illegals to pay back what we pay out on their behalf in one year.
We do not basic a health care program. We need a $100,000.00 cap on malpractice suites. That would eliminate the costs by 2/3rds. But you will never get the politicians to go against their own kind(lawyers).
elkdevel | Sep 28, 2009
"say it's unfair to bar wrongful immigrants from paying their own way"
This is where I stopped reading. They should address who it's being "unfair" to while funneling billions of dollars annually for verboten immigrants to be here ILLEGALLY!
The disconnect is unbelievable -- grown adults can't fix the dots.
CA - 12 Billion annually
The Federal Government - 10 Billion annually
AZ - ?
NV - ?
NY - ?
IL - ?
In items, I'd aggregate that loss and compare it to the cost to insure Americans...I'd bet that "savings" would quilt the cost of much of a subsidy that would allow people to purchase their own coverage w/ a voucher.
The web we dodge.
Obamanable Faux Man | Sep 28, 2009
Currently anybody legal or unlawful can show up at any ER and receive health treatment, so its not like any taxes paid are not going firsthand and great deal of many hospitals write off a lot of medical bills. I improvise it will turn out although the bills currently are saying no coverage, but once any immigration recover, lets say it is passed, under any amnesty bill, illgals would be able to sign up for health supervision look after. I just wonder how do they intend to pay for a health care that covers everybody?
❶•☆•xXx•☆— BOMB ♥ SHELL☆•xXx•☆•❶ | Sep 28, 2009
First I would like to say that, yes, anyone can show up at an ER and acquire treatment. However that does not address the millions of people who can not afford health be responsible for, and have chronic illnesses that require regular medical treatment, and medication. Try line a doctors office to make an appointment, one of the first things that ask is what kind of insurance you have. If you don't have insurance then you have to pay notes. Which for an office visit can range from $80 to over $300 depending on classification of doctor and treatment received. Medication for chronic illnesses are out of this earth. I honestly don't know how anyone without insurance would survive long with Diabetes, congestive empathy failure or kidney dialysis etc etc. There are millions of families out there that barely provoke enough money to put a roof over their heads and food on the table. There is nothing left over for health insurance.
"In their message, the Democrats said health care costs are much lower for legal immigrants than for inherited citizens. " I totally disagree with this statement. My husband is a legal settler, and we pay $18,820 a yr for medical insurance premiums alone. That does not include co pays and deductibles, nor moneyed for medications. I guess they think that legal immigrants don't get sick or develop persistent health conditions?
In this country 3/4 of people who file for bankruptcy do so due to medical bills, and 50% of those cases had medical insurance. People should not have to put everything they have worked for on the columns d align because of a medical illness. How can the US say they are the greatest country on Earth when we treat our citizens this way? How is this even a developed woods? How come we don't show as much compassion for our own citizens as we claim to show for citizens of other countries?
I assume trust to if an immigrant pays into the system, then they should receive benefits of that system. If the government doesn't fall short of them to have access then stop taking the money out of their paychecks. If they pay into a National health attention system, then they should have immediate access to that system.
Belle
Belle | Sep 28, 2009
Since it is wrongful for these people to be here they should not be considered eligible for any program, whether they pay into it or not.
Consider it a fine for disobeying our immigration laws.
As big as illegal aliens receive benefits in any form from the US they will continue to rise illegally.
If the Fed's seriously want to put a permanent stop to illegal immigration they have got to take away the incentives that depend on b come close them here.
"It is simplly wrong that any taxes paid in would go to any new programs and should be utilized only to pay back what US taxpayers have already expended in their behalf." It has taken 20 years for illegals to pay back what we pay out on their behalf in one year.
Sasori | Sep 28, 2009
COBRA - What Is It and How Does It Work?
declined it. That means, if Gary's health insurance set someone back his company $300 a month, and cost Gary $200 a month, his total insurance payment was ...
d Directory
Legal & General - Health
Health. Gratefulness you for enquiring about the health insurance cover available from Legal & General, but as from 28 February 2007 we are no longer quoting ...
Life Insurance - Legal & General Direct
Buy survival insurance from Legal & General before 31 March 2010 and receive a £40 M&S voucher, as well as presentation winning protection for your family or mortgage
Depending where you room and how the market is right now, real estate can be a good venture without certainly having a college degree. Granted you will be taking a real demesne class for your license but even so this is a great thing to have.