How Can People Believe In Universal Healthcare "insurance" When It Never Worked Anywhere In The World?
May 20, 2008 by D bolt | Posted in Insurance
Measureless healthcare is too expensive. The poor is ready covered with insurance. Youll have to wait a year to get a surgery and by the epoch of surgery your all ready dead. UNiversal healthcare will be over used.
Ask yourself "Why some people don't understand how to determine if some mail are scam or not?"
You'll find an answer.
Ask yourself "Why some people don't differentiate how to determine if some mail are scam or not?"
You'll find an answer.
FelixTheCat | May 20, 2008
So what,Veterans Trim Care you wait a year to see a Doctor for surgery,then another year for surgery.
Some people ain't blast rich like Republicans.
Doc. justasinner111 | May 20, 2008
Well, our (U.S.A.) advantage system was created to help the poorest of the poor. It was done so with the optimistic idea of serving those in most need. Unfortunately, the system has been over-taxed and abused. Let's hope that doesn't come off with universal healthcare, as well.
Curious Party | May 20, 2008
I'm not a fan of All-encompassing Health Care but it has worked in other countries. The problem is the countries where it works are much smaller than 300 million people. And most of those countries are not capitalist like the skilled old USA. We are not fans of high taxes. Changing our system would be like turning an Aircraft Porter around you can't do it very easily or quickly.
If you want to learn about UHC in other countries try watching "Bizarre Around The World". It is not as one sided as I expected. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/ sickaroundtheworld/
Insurance Made Easy.biz | May 20, 2008
Because they don't requirement to be educated about how the real world works, and they don't want to know how well it's working in other countries. It's a "gimme gimme" position, voting in the politicians that will "dole out" the most/best benefits.
It's stunted sighted, irresponsible, and ignorant.
mbrcatz17 | May 20, 2008
Why Are People Opposed To The Healthcare Bill And Not Automobile Insurance?
Sep 11, 2009 by Policía de la Inteligencia | Posted in Other - Politics & Government
You have to have it even if you don't long for to. So, why are you opposed to healthcare insurance to actually look out for the well being of humans?
Hey TAT
are you conscious that the GOVERNMENT is the SOLE provider in the United States for FLOOD INSURANCE ??
and
Justine
Everyone pays for UNINSURED MOTORISTS in their car insurance premiums
and MOST besotted drivers are uninsured and have licenses revoked
You are confusing. People are opposed to govt ran govt funded health be concerned coverage. I am opposed to the govt providing auto insurance, home insurance and biography insurance as well.
Yes, Don, I am. Are you aware that they won't provide you with fire, theft, vandalism, wind, etc. coverage. Peradventure they should. They have just as much right to do that as they do to provide for health coverage. Maybe we should just now surrender all of our money and let the nanny govt dole it out to us on an as needed main ingredient.
TAT | Sep 11, 2009
No one is opposed to insurance what we are opposed to is being phoney to pay for your insurance . Do you think it fair to have to pay for a drunk drivers auto insurance ? NO? Well then why do you think its decent to be forced to pay for the drug addicts, alcoholic or the sex addicts health insurance ?
justine | Sep 11, 2009
Hey TAT
are you cognizant that the GOVERNMENT is the SOLE provider in the United States for FLOOD INSURANCE ??
and
Justine
Everyone pays for UNINSURED MOTORISTS in their car insurance premiums
and MOST pissed drivers are uninsured and have licenses revoked
Don B | Sep 11, 2009
Don B, you have a option, if you don't want uninsured you don't have to have it. and it also covers hit and run
msnbcsucks | Sep 11, 2009
Who Would YOU Prefer To Ration YOUR FAMILY'S HEALTHCARE: Competing Private Insurance Companies Or The Govrnmnt?
Sep 20, 2009 by Ophelia | Posted in Politics
Who would YOU incline towards to ration YOUR FAMILY'S HEALTHCARE:
1. Competing private insurance companies
OR
2. The government
Employ that the choice 1 includes getting passed the Democrats obstruction of being skilled to buy private healthcare insurance across state lines.
Assume that choice 2 means a achieve transition toward a Single-Payer healthcare system where it becomes a government-run monopoly with only minimal hermit-like options, like Canada.
If I had to settle upon I guess #1. Private markets are always more competitive than government = less coins
Either one. As extensive as I can afford SOME type of insurance, I'm OK>.
Kevin B. | Sep 20, 2009
Anything the govt doesn't have its detrimental hands in.
Randy F | Sep 20, 2009
Covertly companies. They can drop you, yes, but you're more likely to get something you need with a company that needs to keep people in their function than with the government who couldn't care less about the individual.
Government screwed up the reserved health care companies anyway, though. Lift the restrictions on buying fettle care in different states, etc. and we don't have a big problem anymore.
Brent H | Sep 20, 2009
If I had to judge I guess #1. Private markets are always more competitive than government = less flush
Stop Spending Our Money | Sep 20, 2009
Who would YOU lean to ration YOUR FAMILY'S HEALTHCARE: competing private insurance companies or the govrnmnt?
Facility to choose between the two options.
Victory ! | Sep 20, 2009
John Stossel: Insurance Makes Healthcare Far More Expensive
John Stossel makes the situation that we should pay for own healthcare. What a shocking notion!
AARP Health Care
Offers plans for retirees including Medicare supplements, infirmary indemnity insurance, AARP Eye Health Vision Care, and prescription savings benefits.
Ask yourself "Why some people don't understand how to determine if some mail are scam or not?"
I'm all for government-run 
RT : Amid false hypotheticals re death panels, real ones exist today in the form of insurance companies denying treatment. 
Amid false hypotheticals re death panels, real ones exist today in the form of insurance companies denying treatment.